Suggested username for dating site partner suchen kostenlos Moerskostenlose partnerbörse Berlin
For some time now, however, she has been spending the time after school at the home of Mrs N, the wife of a local vicar, until one or the other parent collects her. Applications were made by both parents in early 2014 with regard to C's care which led, ultimately, to the hearing before the Recorder.
The father's application was made before the advent of child arrangements orders so was for a shared residence order reflecting the present arrangements for C, with an extension of his weekend time to Monday mornings.
In either type of relocation case, external or internal, a Judge is likely to find helpful some or all of the considerations referred to in  ; but not as a prescriptive blueprint; rather and merely as a checklist of the sort of factors which will or may need to be weighed in the balance when determining which decision would better serve the welfare of the child.
Summary by Tom Harvey, barrister, 1 Hare Court__________________Case No: B4/2015/1151Neutral Citation Number:  EWCA Civ 1305IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)ON APPEAL FROM THE CENTRAL FAMILY COURTMR RECORDER DIGNEYFD14P00296Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LLDate: 18/12/2015- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -RE C (INTERNAL RELOCATION) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Mr Charles Hale QC (instructed by Penningtons Manches LLP) for the Appellant Miss Deborah Eaton QC & Mr Stephen Jarmain (instructed by Stewarts Law LLP) for the Respondent Mr Damian Garrido QC & Dr Rob George (instructed by Dawson Cornwell) on behalf of the Intervener, the International Centre for Family Law, Policy and Practice Hearing date: 28Lady Justice Black: 1.
The mother applied for a specific issue order permitting her to move with C to Cumbria where C would start at a new day school.
C spends two nights a week and every other weekend with the father, returning to the mother on Sunday evenings. Initially, she was looked after by nannies whilst the parents were at work.This is an appeal against orders made on 23 March 2015 by Mr Recorder Digney in relation to C, who was born in October 2005 and is 10 years old.C's mother wished to move from London to Cumbria, taking C with her, and the appellant, C's father, who has always had a considerable involvement in her life, wished the present London based arrangements for C to continue along much the same lines.The Recorder had evidence from both parents, written and oral.In addition, CAFCASS provided a report, and the CAFCASS officer gave oral evidence.
She was concerned that the move "may be emotionally damaging for C as she will not be able to enjoy the type of relationship with the father that she has had for all of her life". As for the rest of the material available to the Recorder, the following resumé, taken largely from his judgment and incorporating his findings on certain salient matters, should be sufficient to set the scene for the points which arose in the appeal.8.